Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-ai: September 2004:
[freeciv-ai] Re: (PR#10110) AI underestimates Temples

[freeciv-ai] Re: (PR#10110) AI underestimates Temples

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: mstefek@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [freeciv-ai] Re: (PR#10110) AI underestimates Temples
From: "Marko Lindqvist" <marko.lindqvist@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:28:27 -0700
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: >

Jason Short wrote:
> At its core granary just increases food output.  It allows 50% of food 
> to be saved when certain things happen.  Thus it basically grants extra 
> food at an ammortized rate of food_surplus/2.

  Why division by 2? Food_surplus gives only 50% of total food - just 
like granary.
  Also, when food_surplus < 0, granary has positive impact, not negative 
- but which kind of math we should use there (without granary city may 
shrinks every turn once food_storage <= 0, with granary only once every 
foodbox/2/-food_surplus turns)

  - Caz

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]