[freeciv-ai] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#9886) better AI unit assert
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
To: |
undisclosed-recipients: ; |
|
Subject: |
[freeciv-ai] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#9886) better AI unit assert |
|
From: |
"Per I. Mathisen" <per@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:18:43 -0700 |
|
Reply-to: |
rt@xxxxxxxxxxx |
<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=9886 >
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Jason Short wrote:
> >>But can't you get this information from the backtrace anyway?
> >
> > Err, no. That's the _point_. The role is usually set much earlier than the
> > assert. Sometimes in the turn before or several turns earlier (for
>
> Um, what? It's still in the unit struct which is easily visible.
> Although I misspoke when I said "from the backtrace", I meant "in the
> debugger".
Oh. So you suggest that I keep the part of the patch that adds this info
to the unit struct, but drop the special assert? That's not a dumb idea.
It makes the patch only half as ugly.
- Per
|
|
