[aclug-L] volunteers
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Some thoughts in the wake of last night's meeting:
1) There was some (I think inconclusive, although maybe I'm just
hoping) discussion about organizational structure, membership,
voting, etc. Someone needs to formalize some sort of proposal.
(Let's face it, "Dictator for Life" doesn't cut it.)
My own proto-proposal is simply that the "committee" should
be thrown open to anyone who wants actively participate in
it, and that "committee" discussions should be public. First
one attempts to achieve consensus; only failing that do we
fall back on voting (which raises the who-gets-to-vote issue).
I also think there are at least three clear-cut roles that
need to be filled:
a) Someone to deal with high-level organizational matters.
b) Someone to plan and run the meetings, events, etc.
c) Someone to build and direct the website.
These could, of course, be multiple people in each case;
some people could take on multiple roles.
2) The role I am interested in is building the software and
directing the content for the website. (I hope that someone
else can deal with the basic issues of hosting and sysadmin
the website.) The approach I favor (and I'll write up more
on this later) is to use a mix of existing and custom (new)
software; the latter would be a proper software bazaar
project; most of the content would be collected from users.
My favorite software for this sort of website is OpenACS:
http://www.openacs.org/
OpenACS software tracks community members (log in, get a
cookie); provides extensive support for community interests
(news, forums, faq-builder, polls/surveys, classified ads,
member pages); has flexible admin options; has support for
programmed tutorials (it can step you through a tutorial,
administer quizzes, and since it tracks members, keep your
place across sessions; it can make suggestions based on
what you've seen). OTOH, it needs some work to clean up,
apply a nifty design, and hack in new features, and content
like the FAQs needs human editing.
3) I'd like to suggest that next Monday's meeting split into
two groups (after some preliminaries), one for meetings and
the other for website. (Website was largely ignored at last
night's meeting.)
4) The other point that bears repeating is that right now it
is exceptionally important to show up at Monday's meeting,
although any comments made on this list are most welcome.
--
/*
* Tom Hull * thull at kscable.com * http://www.tomhull.com/
*/
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
- [aclug-L] volunteers,
Tom Hull <=
- [aclug-L] Re: volunteers, Jonathan Hall, 2002/02/07
- [aclug-L] Re: volunteers, Tom Hull, 2002/02/08
- [aclug-L] Re: volunteers, Ryan Hunt, 2002/02/08
- [aclug-L] Re: volunteers, Clint Brubakken, 2002/02/08
- [aclug-L] Re: volunteers, Tom Hull, 2002/02/08
- [aclug-L] Re: volunteers, Jonathan Hall, 2002/02/08
- [aclug-L] Re: volunteers, Clint Brubakken, 2002/02/08
- [aclug-L] Re: volunteers, Tom Hull, 2002/02/08
- [aclug-L] Re: volunteers, Jonathan Hall, 2002/02/08
- [aclug-L] Re: volunteers, Jeff Vian, 2002/02/08
|
|