[aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
This started a nice little discussion, to bad the same day this was announced
AOL declined
it ever happned..
The truth is linux can be just as easy if not easier to install now days
than windows.. SuSE is one fine example of a near braindead install.. Its has
less to do with
any limitations linux has vs windows but more that retraining people a new OS
is just not
redeemable in most people's eyes..
Last year, both my mother and sister learned how to
use a computer... Both of them had very little if no expierence with Microsoft
Windows, I
setup there machine and tought them how to use linux to surf the internet, do
email, play
games, and use staroffice.. Other than the fact that my mother has to consult
me before
purchasing anything for her computer she can do just as much in linux not
knowing anything
as most people do in windows (without knowing anything). With linux security I
dont have to
worry about my sister messing up my mom's stuff and vice versa, In fact they
cant cause any
harm to the system with the little permissions ive given them...
Now when I tell people
that both my mother and sister use linux, one of the first reactions I get is
that both of them
must be genious geeks as well.. They proably know less than the average windows
user
because they have never had to fix anything and rarely expirence crashes.. Im
shure most of
you have learned from your first expirecnes with linux.. Its much easier to
learn linux
from the start than having to relearn computing after becoming familar with
windows...
I my self washed my hands of the evil empire almost a year ago.. With the
exception of a couple annoying little cirmustances I have never needed the
assistance of
windows to perform any task I sought to perform.. After months of surfing,
programing,
gaming, downloading, socialising, and belive it or not but WORKING in linux I
feel
confident that not only can I perform these tasks using linux but I can do them
faster and
more efficently than I ever could from Windows...
With microsoft's new found beliefs in
security I could see the possibility of windows becoming a decent operating
system.. That
is if microsoft can keep the promices and prove to the world that this is just
not another PR
stunt.. As for AOL, they might not be a bad thing for linux, but working at a
handfull of ISP's
and dealing with alot of AOL's sh*t constantly I dont think I could ever speak
nicely of AOL
so I think it is best I dont say anything at all :)
There is my $0.02 in opinions, take em for
what they are worth..
-Ryan
>
>
http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/industry/01/21/aol.red.hat.ap/index.html
>
> My
quick take:
>
> Good = possible competitor for Microsoft in the "desktop" arena
>
> Bad =
every RPM puts and IM icon on your desktop
>
> -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To
unsubscribe,
> visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, (continued)
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Michael Moore, 2002/01/27
- [aclug-L] BeOS, Ivan Trail, 2002/01/27
- [aclug-L] Re: BeOS, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2002/01/27
- [aclug-L] Re: BeOS, David Carmichael, 2002/01/27
- [aclug-L] Re: BeOS, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2002/01/27
[aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Lars von dem Ast, 2002/01/21
[aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Bruce Alderman, 2002/01/21
[aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?,
Ryan Hunt <=
|
|