[aclug-L] Re: Why Debian?
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
well, believe me... don't use redhat! : ^ ) we use it here at work, and
it's nothing but a pain in my @ss... debian is the way to go ... there,
if that's not enuf proof, i don't know what is! : ^ )
iirc, i've seen numerous articles comparing distros on ZDnet and
linuxnewbie.org... maybe even on linux.com... i guess you could just
search on google and it would turn up numerous hits...
--
Jesse Kaufman | WebSurf Internet Access
Administration / Web Development | www.websurf.net
glandix@xxxxxxxxxxx | Ph: 316.945.7873
www.linuxfreak.com/~glandix | Fax: 316.946.9944
--
<<< Vim is a REAL man's text editor. I don't know why anyone else would
even bother with sissy programs like emacs, or even worse... pico! >>>
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Carl D Cravens wrote:
> I work for Boeing, who have been rather slow to adopt Linux in any offical
> way, and rather annoyed at any unofficial uses. The central lan group
> (NT) is having trouble load-testing their new NT servers with NT and are
> wanting to try a Linux solution.
>
> Problem is, they've chosen Red Hat because it has the most
> name-recognition and it's easy to install. I've always run Debian because
> it's supposedly the most stable and all. I've not had a lick of trouble
> with it (except for apt uninstalling telnet during the upgrade from 2.0 to
> 2.1). The thing is, the NT guys don't know much about Linux (at least the
> ones using it that I'm working with) and they're going to come to me (HP
> Unix admin) for help. *And* I could have a strong influence on Boeing
> Wichita's choice of distro. I've heard that Red Hat is generally buggy
> and I know that Debian has well-established and well-run stable-release
> process.
>
> My question is: Can anyone point me to well-written arguments for or
> against particular distros in a Unix-savvy, availability-critical
> environment? My personal experience points to Debian, but I'd like to
> have some more info to back it up.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Carl D Cravens (raven@xxxxxxxxxxx)
> I've got a chainsaw... what could go wrong?
>
>
> -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
> visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
>
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
- [aclug-L] How to restore a partition table, james l, 2000/10/08
- [aclug-L] Re: How to restore a partition table, John Phillips, 2000/10/08
- [aclug-L] Re: How to restore a partition table, Clint A. Brubakken, 2000/10/09
- [aclug-L] Why Debian?, Carl D Cravens, 2000/10/11
- [aclug-L] Re: Why Debian?,
Jesse Kaufman <=
- [aclug-L] Re: Why Debian?, Jonathan Hall, 2000/10/11
- [aclug-L] Re: Why Debian?, Ryan Claycamp, 2000/10/11
- [aclug-L] Re: Why Debian?, John Reinke, 2000/10/12
- [aclug-L] Re: Why Debian?, Jonathan Hall, 2000/10/12
- [aclug-L] Re: Why Debian?, Greg House, 2000/10/12
- [aclug-L] Re: Why Debian?, Carl D Cravens, 2000/10/12
- [aclug-L] Re: Why Debian?, Clint A. Brubakken, 2000/10/12
- [aclug-L] Re: Why Debian?, Greg House, 2000/10/12
- [aclug-L] Re: Why Debian?, Jesse Kaufman, 2000/10/12
- [aclug-L] Re: Why Debian?, Jonathan Hall, 2000/10/12
|
|