[tetrinext] Re: let's talk about the chat interface. (fwd)

[<jcommons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

oops :)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 22:19:42 +0000 (GMT)
From: jcommons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: Jared Johnson <solomon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [tetrinext] Re: let's talk about the chat interface.

DCC is a feature of the client and not the server.

I suggest we all read rfc1459, understand it, become experts, and then
comment on what needs adding and removing should it be used :)

On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Jared Johnson wrote:

> 
> > Right now, they just slipped out of my head.  Any ideas on what features
> > of IRC we should _not_ copy ?
> 
> well, i think we should totally drop everything DCC related...well, maybe file
> transfer would be okay but i don't know it would be worh it, users don't 
> really
> feel like having everyone know their IP when signed onto the server.  Of 
> course,
> server ops should have easy access to IPs, just no one else =)
> 
> alot of features of Nickserv and Chanserv don't have to be carried over -- 
> just
> the basics.
> 
> alot of irc "modes" are also not needed.  some are, but not many.
> 
> btw, the quake console thing is a very good idea.  goodbye crappy partyline =)
> 
> time for breakfast, and then bed.  goodmorning goodnight.
> 
> -- 
> Jared Johnson
> solomon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> We are each entitled to our own opinion, but no one is entitled to his
> own facts.
>               -- Patrick Moynihan
> 
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version:  3.12
> GCS/C d+(-)>-- s:+ a18 C++++$ UL++++>$ P+>++++ L+++ E--- W+ N+ o? K- w--- !O
> M-- V-- !PS !PE Y PGP- t+ 5-- X R-- tv- b+ DI>+ !D G e>++(>+++) h-- r* y-(+++)
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> 
> 
> 
>