[gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
We seem to have a communication problem :-) I saw Fortran and thought
that you were being facetious and mocking my Python suggestion! I
wasn't trying to mock the Lispish suggestion.
-- John
MJ Ray <markj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Well, I suggested Python for several reasons:
> > 1. A lot of framework is already done.
> > 2. There are no buffer overflow issues to worry about.
> > 3. It's fast to write such a thing in Python.
>
> I suggested a Lisp family language (Scheme in my case) for the exact same
> reasons, so I don't quite understand your differential. Of course, Lisps
> also provide you with hygenic macros and other powerful tools which I think
> are still absent from current common Pythons(?) but these may not be useful
> in this case.
>
> Do we really care? Just give us more interesting gopher servers powering
> more interesting gopher sites ;-)
> --
> MJR
>
--
John Goerzen <jgoerzen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> GPG: 0x8A1D9A1F www.complete.org
- [gopher] Gopher thoughts, Ralph Furmaniak, 2002/01/15
- [gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts, John Goerzen, 2002/01/16
- [gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts, Ralph Furmaniak, 2002/01/16
- [gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts, MJ Ray, 2002/01/16
- [gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts, Thierry B., 2002/01/17
- [gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts, John Goerzen, 2002/01/17
- [gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts, MJ Ray, 2002/01/17
- [gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts,
John Goerzen <=
- [gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts, MJ Ray, 2002/01/17
[gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts, Paul Lindner, 2002/01/17
|
|