[gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:11:42 -0500
Ralph Furmaniak <sugaku@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > Personally, I think we need a gopherd written in Python, and I aim to
> > do that one of these days. (Really!)
Actually, I wrote one a long time ago.
It still works, but it's somewhat incomplete.
I got stalled because getting definitive protocol answers seemed
to be out of the scope for Gopher. If anybody has better docs than
DRAFT_Gopher_FYI_RFC.txt, Gopher+.txt, or protocol.txt, then
I'm all ears.
It doesn't do gopher+ but normal gopher browsing seems to work.
--
Jon Nelson
jnelson@xxxxxxxxxxx
C and Python Programmer
Motorcycle Enthusiast
- [gopher] Gopher thoughts, Ralph Furmaniak, 2002/01/15
- [gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts, John Goerzen, 2002/01/16
- [gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts, Ralph Furmaniak, 2002/01/16
- [gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts, MJ Ray, 2002/01/16
- [gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts, Thierry B., 2002/01/17
- [gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts, John Goerzen, 2002/01/17
- [gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts, MJ Ray, 2002/01/17
- [gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts, John Goerzen, 2002/01/17
- [gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts, MJ Ray, 2002/01/17
[gopher] Re: Gopher thoughts, Paul Lindner, 2002/01/17
|
|