[Freeciv] Freeciv goals
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
From: Tobias Brox <tobiasb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 11:06:09 +0100 (MET)
Personally I dislike the Civ2 compatibility goal, but since it's that
important to somebody, I'm absolutely in favor of splitting it up >into a
Civ2 mode and a Freeciv mode.
I assume that would have to happen once we reach 2.0? At the moment there
are still a few important features missing, such as true diplomacy and the
senate (what else in Civ2 that Freeciv still doesn't have? Fundamentalism,
a couple of missing units, and wonder effects should be easily adjusted in
the further generalized rulesets.). I think once we have that, we can
declare that it is 99% Civ2 compatible and move on to adding new features.
In that sense, Civ2 compatability is still a valuable and viable goal.
Mike
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
- [Freeciv] Freeciv goals,
Mike Jing <=
|
|