Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-i18n: August 2002:
[freeciv-i18n] Re: Freeciv po files
Home

[freeciv-i18n] Re: Freeciv po files

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Freeciv i18n ML <freeciv-i18n@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [freeciv-i18n] Re: Freeciv po files
From: Christian Knoke <chrisk@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:21:09 +0200

On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:06:11AM +0200, Davide Pagnin wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2002-08-23 at 22:35, Christian Knoke wrote: 
> > 
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:59:53AM +0200, Davide Pagnin wrote:
> > > 
> > > Thus I suggest to modify po/Makefile.in.in and add the -c check to the
> > > relevant line.
> > 
> Well, can some of the maintainer or other involved people, spend some on
> this? 
> 
> There is a problem with actually take this step, many .po files will be
> broken if this -c parameter (but this is because they're wrong!) and
> thus we need to handle this condition in some way. 
> 
> Contacting all translator is one possible thing, but for poorly
> maintained .po files, we need something else. 

Well, is this such a big problem? I found:

File: fr.po
2639 translated messages, 206 fuzzy translations, 79 untranslated messages.
found 2 fatal errors

File: fi.po
2437 translated messages, 309 fuzzy translations, 179 untranslated messages.
found 7 fatal errors

File: hu.po
2589 translated messages, 69 fuzzy translations, 267 untranslated messages.
found 36 fatal errors

only three translations. Just mail the translators the relevant entries,
and then remove them. Most likely the errors are "fuzzy" anyway.

> Gaute, what is your opinion, on this? 
> Is there a configure option viable? 

Christian

-- 
Christian Knoke     * * *      http://www.enter.de/~c.knoke/
* * * * * * * * *  Ceterum censeo Microsoft esse dividendum.


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]