Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: April 2005:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#12869) the happiness system
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#12869) the happiness system

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Cc: freeciv-data@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#12869) the happiness system
From: "Benoit Hudson" <bh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 10:18:26 -0700
Reply-to: bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=12869 >

On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 09:49:43AM -0700, Jason Short wrote:
> 1.
> 2.

correct.

> 3.  If the city is happy for enough turns (rapturedelay) it will go into
> celebration.  Celebrating cities get certain bonuses (rapture or
> enhanced output).  Celebrating status changes only at the end of a turn
> and lasts through the next turn (after which it is rechecked).

was_happy gets set at the beginning of the turn (or the end of the
previous turn) and stays set all turn long.  You're celebrating if
was_happy is set and if city_happy right now.

There's an odd interaction between buildings and happiness.  Consider: 
turn 1: city becomes happy
turn 2: city is celebrating
turn 3: city grows; now there's an unhappy citizen;
        buy a temple
turn 4: city is celebrating

Under monarchy, celebration is odd: if you celebrate, you have higher
trade output.  Which means there's a loop: you are happy if you have
enough luxuries; lux comes from trade; trade comes from celebration.
I'm not sure how this works out.  I do know the CM assumes you are
celebrating if was_happy is set (checking it via a city.c function) and
evaluates solutions based on that; it's not clear to me this is correct.

        -- Benoît





[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]