Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: January 2005:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#11946) a minimal surplus of -20 is too high

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#11946) a minimal surplus of -20 is too high

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#11946) a minimal surplus of -20 is too high
From: "Christian Knoke" <chrisk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 07:03:21 -0800
Reply-to: bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: >

On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 03:07:59AM -0800, Jason Short wrote:
> In the attached image, I set the min surplus of gold to -20 for the 
> city.  This is basically necessary to avoid having some cities be 
> caughed back each turn.  Basically I don't care about the amount of gold 
> for any individual city, only the overall gold.
> But in this city, the minimum of -20 is too high.  Some scientists are 
> turned into taxmen, so I can't take advantage of the science-bonus 
> wonders in the city.

Is there any case, where the minimum restrictions for gold, science, and
luxury per city do service any purpose? In my experience, I always can
achieve better results with the factor settings and/or tax rates.


Christian Knoke            * * *  
* * * * * * * * *  Ceterum censeo Microsoft esse dividendum.

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]