Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: November 2004:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#10830) Trirem doesn't want to move
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#10830) Trirem doesn't want to move

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Francois-Xavier.Coudert@xxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#10830) Trirem doesn't want to move
From: "Mike Kaufman" <kaufman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:22:52 -0800
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=10830 >

On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 10:08:58AM -0800, Jason Short wrote:
> 
> Better to do this as a client option I think.  However we first need 
> client option categories (which is one of my goals for 2.1).
> 
> For 2.0 I'm not sure how, if at all, the current behavior should be changed.

an intermediate option for 2.0 is to allow the goto to happen for unsafe
routes, but to turn the goto line red if it is unsafe. Would this require
two separate PF calculations?

For HEAD, I think safe routes unless a shift-drag or something.

-mike




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]