Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: August 2004:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2521) effects patch

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2521) effects patch

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: kaufman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2521) effects patch
From: "Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa" <vasc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:34:56 -0700
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: >

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Jason Short wrote:

> <URL: >
> Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa wrote:
> > <URL: >
> >
> > On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Jason Short wrote:
> >
> >><URL: >
> >>
> >>Why do you replace the Space_Part effect with individual effects for
> >>each type of space part?  It seems simple to me that Space_Part should
> >>be just one effect with the particular part forming an option for the
> >>effect.
> >
> > Makes no functional difference for the present ruleset. But this way the
> > effects data is self-descriptive (what is more readable: "SS_Module",
> > "1", or "Space_Part", "3"?).
> The latter is more extensible.  Eventually the number of space parts can
> be read from the ruleset.

Yeah, but that way you can only have a space part per improvement.
However, I don't know if that is a very bad restriction or not.

Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa @ Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisboa

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]