[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8891) Help wanted to compile in SuSE 9.1
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: |
undisclosed-recipients: ; |
Subject: |
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8891) Help wanted to compile in SuSE 9.1 |
From: |
"Marcelo Burda" <mburda@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Jun 2004 09:24:12 -0700 |
Reply-to: |
rt@xxxxxxxxxxx |
<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=8891 >
Le mer 02/06/2004 à 16:58, Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa a écrit :
> <URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=8891 >
>
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Jason Short wrote:
>
> >
> > <URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=8891 >
> >
> > > [vasc - Wed Jun 02 12:43:58 2004]:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Marcelo Burda wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > <URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=8891 >
> > > >
> > > > this error is normal or not? i never use automake
> > > > thx for your comment.
> > > >
> > > > automake --version
> > > > automake (GNU automake) 1.8.3
> > > >
> > > > note: somme problem with --disable-autoconf2.52
> > >
> > > Got the same problem here in Fedora 2. I had to downgrade automake to
> > > 1.7.x and autoconf to 2.57. Automake 1.8.x and autoconf 2.59 do not work
> > > with the current Freeciv configuration...
> >
> > I have automake 1.8.5 and autoconf 2.59, and I have no problems.
> >
> > But I agree downgrading your automake is probably your best bet. I have
> > no idea what could be causing your problem.
>
> Fedora 2 comes with automake 1.8.3 and autoconf 2.59 by default. But I
> think I tried automake 1.7.x and autoconf 2.59 and that didn't work
> either. Perhaps this is a bug in automake 1.8.3. Are you certain
> 1.8.5/2.59 are the versions that autogen.sh actually used?
>
Hi,
Mike propose te rm -r autom4te.cache in the freeciv directory and
rerunning autogen.sh.
this work!,
there is a warning but i can upgrade to automake 1.8.3 and compile
freeciv.
> ---
> Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa @ Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisboa
>
>
>
>
|
|