Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: October 2003:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#5437) wishlist: worker unit
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#5437) wishlist: worker unit

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: per@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: jdwheeler42@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#5437) wishlist: worker unit
From: "Jason Short" <jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 04:35:01 -0700
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Genevieve Gracian wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 04:05:21 -0700
> "Per I. Mathisen" <per@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
>>>On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Genevieve Gracian wrote:
>>>
>>>>>- Workers require Granary to be built, instead of requiring Pottery to
>>>>>be known.
>>>>
>>>>Pyramids don't allow to build workers. I think they should.
>>
>>Won't that make Pyramids much too powerful? At least for largepox games.
>>(We could perhaps reduce the build cost for granaries to compensate.)
> 
> 
> Or allow redundancy between pyramids and granary so that a "real"
> granary is still needed to build a worker and Pyramids don't prevent
> workers to be built.

Then pyramids will be nearly obsolete, IMO.

The fact is any global-effecting wonder leads to ICS.  Why should the 
Pyramids be any different?  A anti-ICS ruleset should change these wonders.

jason




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]