Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: March 2003:
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#3643) Re: Suggestion: diff from stable to today
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#3643) Re: Suggestion: diff from stable to today

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#3643) Re: Suggestion: diff from stable to today
From: "ChrisK@xxxxxxxx" <ChrisK@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 03:50:50 -0800
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 06:35:52AM +0100, Raimar Falke wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 09:08:33PM +0100, Christian Knoke wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 07:24:03PM +0100, Raimar Falke wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 03:42:55PM +0200, Juhani Heino wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I didn't find any diff from the latest stable version to the last
> > > > CVS snapshot.
> > > 
> > > > That would be more useful for me, and likely many others
> > > 
> > > Really? Why?
> > 
> > The release version comes with your distibution, including the source.
> > Then, at some point, you want to test the CVS version.
> 
> Why don't you take the real thing then? You know "cvs co" once and
> "cvs up" later. CVS is easy to use, how low bandwidth requirements and
> the current CVS freeciv version is quite stable.

 - Don't think that what's easy for you is easy for others
 - The complete CVS version is more than double size than a diff from 1.14

Christian

-- 
Christian Knoke     * * *      http://www.enter.de/~c.knoke/
* * * * * * * * *  Ceterum censeo Microsoft esse dividendum.




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]