Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: January 2003:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2521) general effects framework 		Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2521) general effects framework

[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: kaufman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2521) general effects framework
From: "Jason Short via RT" <rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:30:12 -0800
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Mike Kaufman via RT wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 03:46:59AM -0800, Ben Webb via RT wrote:

>>Speed cost? I'd imagine it'd be faster if anything. (By bitfield, I mean
>>that defined in the C language - e.g. int active:1; int pending:1 etc.)
> 
> 
> I'll do this.

I'm strongly opposed to that.  These values are boolean, and that's what 
'bool' is for.  If you think there's an advantage to it, instead change 
fc_bool to this type.

jason
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]