[Freeciv-Dev] Re: new_natural_city_names updated again (PR#1127)
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
> > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Jason Short wrote:
> > > + GEN_BOOL("naturalcitynames", game.natural_city_names,
> > > + SSET_RULES_FLEXIBLE, SSET_TO_CLIENT,
> > > + N_("Whether to use natural city names"),
> > > + N_("If enabled, the default city names will be determined
> > > based "
> > > + "on the surrounding terrain."),
> > > + NULL, GAME_DEFAULT_NATURALCITYNAMES)
> > > +
> > >
> > > IMHO, you can just make this the default. Why wouldn't anyone want this?
> > > (And even if they didn't want it, would they bother enough to turn it
> > > off? I doubt it.) I don't like unnecessary "options creep".
> > per@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Well, it is the "default".
> >
> > It would be fine IMO to remove the server option. But since it was so
> > easy I added it in. The reason someone might not want this is that it
> > does tend to change the capital city's name (although within reason,
> > unlike the original natural_city_names patch, and it can be manually
> > changed back). Anyone else with a preference?
> Mike Kaufman wrote:
> Personally I appreciate playing with Rome as my capital, so I might turn it
> off. Keep the option.
I would turn this option off too, so I vote for keeping the option.
Gabor
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: new_natural_city_names updated again (PR#1127), Jason Short, 2002/04/09
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: new_natural_city_names updated again (PR#1127), per, 2002/04/09
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: new_natural_city_names updated again (PR#1127), per, 2002/04/09
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: new_natural_city_names updated again (PR#1127), Jason Short, 2002/04/09
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: new_natural_city_names updated again (PR#1127), Jason Short, 2002/04/10
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: new_natural_city_names updated again (PR#1127), Jason Short, 2002/04/27
|
|