Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: March 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351)

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Reinier Post <rp@xxxxxxxxxx>, freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351)
From: Raahul Kumar <raahul_da_man@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 04:38:11 -0800 (PST)

--- Reinier Post <rp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 01:28:00AM -0800, Raahul Kumar wrote:
> > The transitive function does make sense, and Reinier and I have already
> > discussed it. The only question, and this is a very important question, is
> > who's going to implement it? I'm too busy with the AI to bother with
> ruleset
> > stuff. No one else is even interested. If you want a transitive tech tree
> > parser, Christian, it's up to you.
> Or to me.  You're absolutely right.

So I assume you are going to implement this. 
> However, the parser won't change.  After parsing, a function would be
> invoked that applies its transitive closure.  A function to compute
> it was added just one month ago, so this should be straightforward.

Where? I'm ignorant about ruleset parsing code. It's just not something I've
needed to know. Maybe it's a lot easier to write the transitive closure parser
than I thought.
> -- 
> Reinier

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]