[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351)
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 01:28:00AM -0800, Raahul Kumar wrote:
> The transitive function does make sense, and Reinier and I have already
> discussed it. The only question, and this is a very important question, is
> who's going to implement it? I'm too busy with the AI to bother with ruleset
> stuff. No one else is even interested. If you want a transitive tech tree
> parser, Christian, it's up to you.
Or to me. You're absolutely right.
However, the parser won't change. After parsing, a function would be
invoked that applies its transitive closure. A function to compute
it was added just one month ago, so this should be straightforward.
--
Reinier
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351), (continued)
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351), Raahul Kumar, 2002/03/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351), Daniel L Speyer, 2002/03/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351), Mark Metson, 2002/03/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351), Raahul Kumar, 2002/03/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351), Paul Zastoupil, 2002/03/29
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351), Raahul Kumar, 2002/03/29
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351), Mark Metson, 2002/03/29
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351), Ross W. Wetmore, 2002/03/30
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351), Christian Knoke, 2002/03/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351), Raahul Kumar, 2002/03/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351),
Reinier Post <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351), Raahul Kumar, 2002/03/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351), Mark Metson, 2002/03/28
|
|