Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: March 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351)

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351)
From: Reinier Post <rp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 13:31:26 +0100

On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 01:28:00AM -0800, Raahul Kumar wrote:

> The transitive function does make sense, and Reinier and I have already
> discussed it. The only question, and this is a very important question, is
> who's going to implement it? I'm too busy with the AI to bother with ruleset
> stuff. No one else is even interested. If you want a transitive tech tree
> parser, Christian, it's up to you.

Or to me.  You're absolutely right.

However, the parser won't change.  After parsing, a function would be
invoked that applies its transitive closure.  A function to compute
it was added just one month ago, so this should be straightforward.


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]