[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Cache win_chance in get_defender(attacker) (PR#1269)
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:33:04PM +0000, Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
> So, 1 percent of all time.
> Is it a lot?
IMHO no. contains_special uses 1.9% and was only introduced to make
the interface cleaner. But these 1.9% will go away if we get inlining.
> I don't know...
> But if we use win_chance everywhere we should, this would double.
> However we can get it for free with my patch...
Let it double first.
Raimar
--
email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
reality.sys corrupt. Reboot Universe? (y,n,q)
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Unit-vs-stack sim (was: Cache win_chance), (continued)
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Unit-vs-stack sim (was: Cache win_chance), Raimar Falke, 2002/02/23
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Unit-vs-stack sim (was: Cache win_chance), Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/02/23
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Unit-vs-stack sim (was: Cache win_chance), Raimar Falke, 2002/02/23
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Unit-vs-stack sim (was: Cache win_chance), Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/02/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Unit-vs-stack sim (was: Cache win_chance), Raimar Falke, 2002/02/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Unit-vs-stack sim (was: Cache win_chance), Per I. Mathisen, 2002/02/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Unit-vs-stack sim (was: Cache win_chance), Raimar Falke, 2002/02/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Unit-vs-stack sim (was: Cache win_chance), Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/02/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Cache win_chance in get_defender(attacker) (PR#1269), Raimar Falke, 2002/02/22
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Cache win_chance in get_defender(attacker) (PR#1269), Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/02/22
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Cache win_chance in get_defender(attacker) (PR#1269),
Raimar Falke <=
|
|