Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: February 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Unit-vs-stack sim (was: Cache win_chance)
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Unit-vs-stack sim (was: Cache win_chance)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Gregory Berkolaiko <gberkolaiko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Unit-vs-stack sim (was: Cache win_chance)
From: Raimar Falke <hawk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 20:03:43 +0100
Reply-to: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 07:00:27PM +0000, Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
>  --- Raimar Falke <hawk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 06:29:10PM +0000, Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
> > > >
> > > > How well does it handle unit stacks? Example: pdef1 is a good
> > > > defender, pdef2 is an expensive unit, pdef3 is a cheap one. All in a
> > > > fortress. The attacker will likely destroy pdef1, will also destory
> > > > pdef2 and but will be destroyed by pdef3.
> > > 
> > > What is your question here?
> > 
> > Will the AI correctly attack even if it knows that the attacker will
> > be destoryed but has killed pdef2 before?
> 
> What is "correctly"?

> If the choice of defenders is pdef1, pdef2, pdef3, it should attack twice
> only.  Why would it be destroyed?

AFAI read the code: if you set occupychance to 100% and the target
tile has a fortress or is a city the attacker will continue its
attack.

        Raimar

-- 
 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  "Windows is the one true OS. MS invented the GUI. MS invented 
   the 32 bit OS. MS is open and standard. MS loves you. We have 
   always been at war with Oceana."


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]