[Freeciv-Dev] Re: curiosity
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Andrew Sutton wrote:
On Friday 30 November 2001 03:58 pm, Reinier Post wrote:
As usual, I won't bring in much code, but I'll comment anyway ...
wouldn't it be better to switch to C++ or even Java for 2.0?
ahhh... you speak my language :) C++ is probably a better solution for the
server. a default client could be written using Qt. so, let's switch to c++
for version 2.0 - unless anybody can provide a solid reason why not (don't
forget performance degradation is a myth).
Isn't this exactly what objectciv was all about?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/objectciv
Although, that project does appear rather stalled. Would one of those
developers care to mention what happened to that project?
Stewart.
--
____________________________________________________________________
Stewart Adcock stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.stewart-adcock.co.uk
Dept. Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego
4234 Urey Hall, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0365 USA
lab: +1 858 534 0956 home: +1 858 453 2577
- [Freeciv-Dev] curiosity, Andrew Sutton, 2001/11/30
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: curiosity, Paul Zastoupil, 2001/11/30
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: curiosity, Andrew Sutton, 2001/11/30
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: curiosity, Paul Zastoupil, 2001/11/30
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: curiosity, Andrew Sutton, 2001/11/30
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: curiosity, Marc Butler, 2001/11/30
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: curiosity, Gregor Zeitlinger, 2001/11/30
|
|