Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: June 2000:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: cities should not un-hide squares (PR#416)
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: cities should not un-hide squares (PR#416)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: cities should not un-hide squares (PR#416)
From: Jeff Mallatt <jjm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:09:35 -0400

At 2000/06/25 12:53 , Thue wrote:
>Den søn, 25 jun 2000 skrev Jeff Mallatt:
>> Here's a bug I just noticed with the Fog of War code.
>> 
>> When you build a city, or have it transferred to you (by diplomacy, &c.),
>> the entire city radius is un-hidden.  This is incorrect.  While cities do
>> "add a point of visibility" to an already un-hidden square, they don't by
>> themselves un-hide squares.
>> 
>> When transferring a city, the receiver should have un-hidden only those
>> squares that the giver has un-hidden.  (See
>> give_citymap_from_player_to_player() in the 1.10.0 code
>> <http://www.freeciv.org/lxr/source/server/maphand.c?v=1.10.0#L124>.)
>> 
>> >From what I could tell quickly, it looks like map_{un}fog_city_area() need
>> to take into account what is already un-hidden.  And
>> map_{un}fog_pseudo_city_area() should be removed, and calls to them
>> replaced by appropriate calls to the repaired map_{un}fog_city_area()
>> routines.
>
>The map_{un}fog_pseudo_city_area() functions are there because it was
>practical to use the functionality after the city was removed. no need to
>remove them.
>
>> However, I'm still learning the Fog code, so I'm not sure if this is the
>> correct approach.
>> 
>> jjm
>
>Here is a patch. But I really like it the way it currently is. We need to
>make it a ruleset variable anyway, as the area is always shown in civ ctp
>(and SMAC?), and I would like it to keep working like it is in current CVS
>in freeciv mode. It is much nicer! :)
>
>I don't think it should go in so close to 1.11, and the patch is not
>terribly tested ...
>
>-Thue
> 

Here's an updated patch, with some changes that seem to help.

Attachment: build-city-no-unhide-2.diff
Description: Text document

jjm

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]