[Freeciv-Dev] Re: New Nations

["Sam BC" <sambc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

If we're being accurate to history rather than to 'legend', Arthur should be
leader of the Cornish, as he wasn't a king in the middle-ages/renaissance
sense of the term, more a local chief in a prosperous area _of_cornwall_

At the real time of Arthur, there was no King of England, but disparate
duchys and baronys...
 
 
"They should either come down and say hello, or they should go away."
 
Sam BC

-----Original Message-----
From: Lalo Martins [mailto:lalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 28 February 2000 21:24
To: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: New Nations


On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 10:05:50AM +0000, Robert Brady wrote:
> Attached patch does :
>
>   * Adds Irish, Cornish (yay! you can now be King Arthur!), and Italians

Huh, Arthur never was king of the Cornish.

Actually I've been playing with Arthur ever since I know
Freeciv, about 40% of my games, with 40% as Chinese - either
Mao or Lalo which sounds chinese enough ;-)

Arthur was king of the British which correspond in territory to
England, so that's what I play with. (Of course with 1.10 it's
fun to stick Welsh and play with Merlin instead...)

[]s,
                                               |alo
                                               +----
--
      I am Lalo of deB-org. You will be freed.
                 Resistance is futile.

http://www.webcom.com/lalo      mailto:lalo@xxxxxxxxxx
                 pgp key in the web page

Debian GNU/Linux       ---       http://www.debian.org
Brazil of Darkness   --   http://zope.gf.com.br/BroDar