[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Freeciv and a tournament
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
> > One of the reasons I never really understood the idea of the metaserver
> > until 1.8 or so was because I couldn't find a single line of source to
> > deal with it. Shouldn't we have the metaserver source in the FreeCiv code
> > tree? Not everybody NEEDS the metaserver, and it probably shouldn't be
> > built by default, but if it was just IN the tree, people might start
> > hacking it.
My plans for the metaserver:
- make it use HTTP and a CGI script (much more versatile)
- adjust the UDP-based server to issue HTTP requests
(for backward compatibility)
- support various output formats: HTML, plain text, RDF
> > Maybe it oughta go in? Maybe under, say, "make metaserver" or even a
> > special configure flag, "--with-metaserver" so that normally run
> > configures won't even make the Makefiles for the mserver.
Freeciv needs more players. Having 10 or more different metaservers
would be bad. I would be against distributing the code with Freeciv.
We went through times when the existing metaserver was down for weeks at
a time. Thanks to Paul, this is no longer a problem.
--
Reinier Post
|
|