Re: [Freeciv-Dev] version numbers
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
> For Freeciv, I don't think we really want to maintain a separate
> development series and stable series. It's too much hassle and overhead.
Agreed.
> But at the very least, if you're going to use oddness, you should probably
> use even for stable and odd for unstable -- people will be less surprised
> that way.
Well, the versions are mentioned on the metaserver, and I think they
raise a false expectance of compatibility. So I agree with
Mattias Anderson but I would prefer to go further: use
freeciv-1.8p2sep06
for CVS versions created on Sep, 6. It will be easy to modify the
version string automatically, and the chance of unexpected
incompatibilities is reduced.
--
Reinier
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] version numbers, Martin Willemoes Hansen, 1999/09/11
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] version numbers, David Pfitzner, 1999/09/11
|
|