Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: discussion: January 2000:
[aclug-L] Re: router for Windows LAN
Home

[aclug-L] Re: router for Windows LAN

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: glandix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aclug-L] Re: router for Windows LAN
From: Thomas Wallis <wallis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 09:58:15 -0600 (CST)
Reply-to: aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 glandix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> another dumb question...  are the 10.*.*.* IP addresses reserved for
> local (non-internet) computers?  that is what all the IP's are set to
> on the current LAN, and i cannot change them w/o access to the R&R *NIX
> server...  i'm used to seing 192.168.*.* addresses for LANs, so i was
> just curious...

        Dear Jesse:

        I just dug out my LINUX Network Admin Guide (by Olaf Kirch) (a
very handy book).  I knew that 192.168 was a magic number, but some books
don't mention why.  But the LINUX NAG does.  

It says that "these addresses are only valid within your private
network and are not routed between real Internet sites.  These numbers
are: 

  CLASS       |   Networks
--------------------------
   A          |   10.0.0.0 
   B          |   172.16.0.0 through 172.31.0.0 
   C          |   192.168.0.0 through 192.168.255.0 

Note that the second and third blocks contain 16 and 256 networks,
respectively."

Your client's network using IP address 10.x.x.x is fine, and shouldn't
cause problems.  It is Class A, which allows way more nodes than
necessary, but it should work OK.  

                                Tom W. 


> 
> jesse
> -- 
Disclaimer: All opinions expressed here are my own and not those of WSU.

EMAIL address:  wallis@xxxxxxxxxxx    wallis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  

   



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]