Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: discussion: October 1999:
[aclug-L] Re: IPMasq problems
Home

[aclug-L] Re: IPMasq problems

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: <aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [aclug-L] Re: IPMasq problems
From: "Dale W Hodge" <dwh@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 11:25:01 -0500
Reply-to: aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx


> -----Original Message-----
> From: aclug-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aclug-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of Jeff
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 1999 9:41 AM
> To: aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [aclug-L] Re: IPMasq problems
>
>
> On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, John Reinke wrote:
>
> > # Bring up ethernet link
> > ifconfig eth0 172.16.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 172.16.1.1 up
>
> This looks funny.  eth0's IP is the same as the broadcast addr?

I just looked this up.  That is an archaic use, but still possible. It
really
depends on how the remainder of the network is set up.

--dwh

   __
  / /  (_)__  __ ____  __
 / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /  . . .  t h e   c h o i c e   o f   a
/____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\              G N U   g e n e r a t i o n . . .


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]