Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: discussion: August 1999:
RE: [aclug-L] Star Office is.......BAD!
Home

RE: [aclug-L] Star Office is.......BAD!

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: <aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [aclug-L] Star Office is.......BAD!
From: "David Carmichael" <dec29111@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 09:13:28 -0500
Reply-to: aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Not in color.......... Only B&W.

David E Carmichael


-----Original Message-----
From: aclug-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aclug-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Jonathan Hall
Sent: Monday, August 16, 1999 8:25 AM
To: aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [aclug-L] Star Office is.......BAD!


On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, David Carmichael wrote:

>       And WordPerfect is a smaller download, a faster program, and less of a
>       resource hog.
> 
>       Of course WP for Linux doesn't do spreadsheets and all the other fancy
>       things that StarOffice does--but I don't need those things anyway.
> 
> Well if you could get my Canon BJC4400 (or for that much most any Color
> Canon printer to work with X-WP8 I know many users would love to know
> how....  My wife for one!!

If ghostscript supports a BJC4400, then WP8 does.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  Jonathan Hall  *  jonhall@xxxxxxxxxxxx  *  PGP public key available
 Systems Admin, Future Internet Services; Goessel, KS * (316) 367-2487
         http://www.futureks.net  *  PGP Key ID: FE 00 FD 51
         -=  Running Debian GNU/Linux 2.0, kernel 2.0.36  =-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]