Re: Considering reverting imaplib2.py and IDLE support - need feedback
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Mike Dawson wrote:
>
> I think idle support is a really important thing to have and was
> something that mail addicts really appreciate - I mean having to wait
> for the sync to get your spam makes some people twitch.
<grin>
Of course, I agree... the problem is that the existing code that
provides it required a switch to a library that has introduced stability
problems. I think I am going to have to revert it for now. I just got
yet another bug report about it. I think imaplib2 is not ready for
prime time yet.
-- John
- Considering reverting imaplib2.py and IDLE support - need feedback, John Goerzen, 2009/08/09
- Re: Considering reverting imaplib2.py and IDLE support - need feedback, David Favro, 2009/08/09
- Re: Considering reverting imaplib2.py and IDLE support - need feedback, Tim Gray, 2009/08/09
- Re: Considering reverting imaplib2.py and IDLE support - need feedback, Mike Dawson, 2009/08/10
- Re: Considering reverting imaplib2.py and IDLE support - need feedback, Mike Dawson, 2009/08/10
- Re: Considering reverting imaplib2.py and IDLE support - need feedback, John Goerzen, 2009/08/10
- Message not available
- Re: Considering reverting imaplib2.py and IDLE support - need feedback, John Goerzen, 2009/08/10
|
|