[gopher] Re: New Gopher server and client

[Mateusz Viste <mateusz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Monday 16 February 2009 20:27, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
> Well, I guess it brings back the old question of whither Gopher+. I think
> it has potential, but I am also sympathetic to the position that it's too
> much like HTTP. It *is* certainly a heavier protocol than the glorious
> simplicity of standard Gopher.
Well... If you ask ME, I would that indeed, gopher+ is just like http. I see no 
interest in it... I like gopher for its bare simplicity, which allows to put 
any stuff online without any effort (and still gaving the possibility to 
represent documents in a nice way).

However, I have to admit that Gopher+ support is on the todo list of my Gopher 
server (The Grumpy http & gopher server, remember?). ;-)
But that support is rather a "for fun" entry, as I never really used Gopher+ 
myself.

Best regards,
Mateusz Viste
-- 
You'll find my public OpenPGP key at gopher://gopher.viste-family.net/1/PGP

-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --
-- File: signature.asc
-- Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAABAgAGBQJJmcNxAAoJEC30Ty9xnkvbO/wH/igqOaJkmBNHLep9EEGGVml8
XVBuKlb0X0BMLJyUVD5+0YcEYJjq3pLnmeZew7VNGOdIHlkdh/Njw3Xni9gBBjI7
KvhpmUaG0RbkHQZnvdVqY8MxH7dvPicNPz3u1We6nl441d6qxXF5B1Ql2zoRbf9N
vkd9wh/EQUQlVM0iqgsgxhzDr54Vs4d0pB3K8/dCFpOfmcQUZWYCDptRLELslNi5
J0XAjUllVDr0wbe4u01YqxoXiA9xX9P2fUUeYyNpqAQTIvckxxu4izbo2LCRNZHP
5TG9T+ylXSZHOvIqmfkoJDbP9tA1hOV7XLYGAoBoW2p2Pmi6iKE+8FxsPbkBov0=
=FN0p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----