[gopher] Re: New Gopher server and client
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:27:56AM -0800, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
> Well, I guess it brings back the old question of whither Gopher+. I think
> it has potential, but I am also sympathetic to the position that it's too
> much like HTTP.
I'm not that familiar with Gopher+...does this mean there is a lot
more responsibility on the client to properly render content and form?
--Brian
- [gopher] Re: New Gopher server and client, (continued)
- [gopher] Re: New Gopher server and client, Cameron Kaiser, 2009/02/16
- [gopher] Re: New Gopher server and client, Mateusz Viste, 2009/02/16
- [gopher] Re: New Gopher server and client, Matjaž Mešnjak, 2009/02/16
- [gopher] Re: New Gopher server and client, Mateusz Viste, 2009/02/16
- [gopher] Re: New Gopher server and client, Benjamin Newman, 2009/02/16
- [gopher] Re: New Gopher server and client, Matjaž Mešnjak, 2009/02/16
- [gopher] Re: New Gopher server and client, JumpJet Mailbox, 2009/02/17
- [gopher] Re: New Gopher server and client, Benjamin Newman, 2009/02/17
- [gopher] Re: New Gopher server and client, Mateusz Viste, 2009/02/18
- [gopher] Re: New Gopher server and client, Benjamin Newman, 2009/02/18
- [gopher] Re: New Gopher server and client,
Brian Koontz <=
- [gopher] Re: New Gopher server and client, Matjaž Mešnjak, 2009/02/17
|
|