Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: gopher: August 2008:
[gopher] Re: Fate of the Protocol (was Re: Gopherness)
Home

[gopher] Re: Fate of the Protocol (was Re: Gopherness)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: gopher@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gopher] Re: Fate of the Protocol (was Re: Gopherness)
From: "Jay Nemrow" <jnemrow@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 13:24:40 -0600
Reply-to: gopher@xxxxxxxxxxxx

I think you are absolutely right about the kinds of behaviors www and
gopher promote.  (Look! we agree!)  Unfortunately, I don't think it
matters to people in the real world.  I prefer to call this
"realistic" and hope no one is foolish enough to think someone will be
tweeking gopher into some "www-killer".

Remember, I run a gopher server, too.  I have my reasons as well.

On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Avery M. <averym@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This is overly pessimistic. I maintain a gopher because I like the
> undemanding nature of the protocol. Unlike HTTP, whose cognitive style
> rewards distraction and skimming, Gopher gives you a decidedly
> un-hyper text file and then it's done. I believe other people should
> maintain gophers as well, and to that end this list is useful.
>
>
>



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]