[gopher] Re: BRING THE GOPHER BACK
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
> There is a quite important issue on this, keeping gopher in Mozilla
> core. Please see gopher://gopher.floodgap.com/1/gopher/keepcore .
> Cameron was working on a JavaScript implementation of Gopher protocol
> support (see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388195 for
> more information) because it's more or less the implicit deal.
Except that I did indeed hit the wall that Christian B did talk about --
I'm going to have to start from scratch with the 1.8.* sources and I
know even less about those. If someone has more experience with Mozilla
XPCOM than I do, I would freely relinquish the project!
> People look at this newsgroup and think that Gopher is dead and
> buried. Let's show that they're wrong.
I think John's concern is well-taken, although I'll make a better
effort of posting announcements to both places.
Like I said previously, the statistics question is being actively worked
on. I want a little more acquisition time before I'm ready to release
what I have.
--
------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-- There's an old proverb that says just about whatever you want it to. -------
- [gopher] BRING THE GOPHER BACK, Pawel, 2007/11/12
- [gopher] Re: BRING THE GOPHER BACK, Cameron Kaiser, 2007/11/12
- [gopher] Re: BRING THE GOPHER BACK, Kacper Gutowski, 2007/11/12
- [gopher] Re: BRING THE GOPHER BACK, Peter Tynan, 2007/11/13
- [gopher] Re: BRING THE GOPHER BACK, Stegozor, 2007/11/15
- [gopher] Re: BRING THE GOPHER BACK, JumpJet Mailbox, 2007/11/20
|
|