[Freeciv] Re: Dirigible

[nicholas.g.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

>Eddie
    >I've seen (at least some of) their posts (and yours).  And I
>haven't noticed any gaps in the thread so far.  No worries here.
>:-)

nick
I think some of the previous discussion suggested
attack 0
defence 1?

Was the proposal that the dirigible be mainly for
1) exploration
2) troop carrier
in that order of priority?

I only got the very tail end of that discussion.



************************************************************
Opinions contained in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect
the opinions of the Queensland Department of Main Roads,
Queensland Transport or Maritime Safety Queensland, or
endorsed organisations utilising the same infrastructure.
If you have received this electronic mail message in error,
please immediately notify the sender and delete the message
from your computer.
************************************************************