[Freeciv] Re: Cannot run civclient... (PR#640)
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Gaute B Strokkenes <gs234@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 12 Jan 2001, gc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Gaute B Strokkenes <gs234@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> > That's me -- but I doubt it could produce anything valuable with
> >> > freeciv compiled without "-g" and with "-fomit-frame-pointer"..
> >>
> >> Gack! IMHO one should always compile with -g. It doesn't change
> >> the output from the compiler other than the addition of debugging
> >> info, which you will typically strip on installation.
> >
> > So what's the point of having them if at installation you remove
> > them??
>
> So that you can look up the numbers from a coredump (or whatever).
Which numbers? One stripped, the binary will lack all symbols, I don't see
what you can do..
Also, our aim is to limit the size of the binary, and the need of proper
debugging would require building with -g, not stripping binaries, for all
binaries, and also for the whole glibc, for gtk+, etc. This is simply too
high cost.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
- [Freeciv] Re: Cannot run civclient... (PR#640), Gaute B Strokkenes, 2001/01/04
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [Freeciv] Re: Cannot run civclient... (PR#640), Gaute B Strokkenes, 2001/01/08
- [Freeciv] Re: Cannot run civclient... (PR#640), Guillaume Cottenceau, 2001/01/08
- [Freeciv] Re: Cannot run civclient... (PR#640), Gaute B Strokkenes, 2001/01/12
- [Freeciv] Re: Cannot run civclient... (PR#640), Guillaume Cottenceau, 2001/01/12
- [Freeciv] Re: Cannot run civclient... (PR#640), Gaute B Strokkenes, 2001/01/12
- [Freeciv] Re: Cannot run civclient... (PR#640),
Guillaume Cottenceau <=
|
|