Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: December 2005:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#14982) capturing a city gives negative borders
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#14982) capturing a city gives negative borders

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#14982) capturing a city gives negative borders
From: "Per I. Mathisen" <per@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:11:14 -0800
Reply-to: bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=14982 >

On Mon, 26 Dec 2005, Per I. Mathisen wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2005, Jason Short wrote:
> > When I capture a city, I immediately get ownership of the city tile but
> > every tile around the city is still owned by the enemy.The result is
> > that no tiles can be worked and the city typically starves horribly for
> > several turns.
> >
> > Is this a bug or a feature?
>
> It is an interesting consequence of the new borders rules.

Actually, an interesting-er question is why you didn't conquer that city's
borders. Was the city on conquest not the source of any tiles of its own?
How could that happen?

  - Per





[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]