Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: December 2004:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#11477) gen imprs

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#11477) gen imprs

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#11477) gen imprs
From: "Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa" <vasc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 12:07:10 -0800
Reply-to: bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: >

On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Per I. Mathisen wrote:

> <URL: >
> I read it and liked it a lot. What do you intend to do to palace, and how
> do you plan on implementing satellites? The removal of equiv_range brings

I was thinking of making palace a small wonder, albeith one that can be
moved (this would be a special flag for wonders). Satellites would sort of
be like small wonders, in that they are per player specific, but without a
hard limitation in number or belonging to a city.

> some rules change, I guess, and this needs to be spelled out. If I
> understand the change correctly - that any restrictions on building
> redundant buildings is now gone except for building the same great wonder
> twice - then this is quite acceptable to me.

Yes, this is more or less how it should work now.

Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa @ Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisboa

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]