[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#11477) gen imprs
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=11477 >
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Per I. Mathisen wrote:
> <URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=11477 >
>
> I read it and liked it a lot. What do you intend to do to palace, and how
> do you plan on implementing satellites? The removal of equiv_range brings
I was thinking of making palace a small wonder, albeith one that can be
moved (this would be a special flag for wonders). Satellites would sort of
be like small wonders, in that they are per player specific, but without a
hard limitation in number or belonging to a city.
> some rules change, I guess, and this needs to be spelled out. If I
> understand the change correctly - that any restrictions on building
> redundant buildings is now gone except for building the same great wonder
> twice - then this is quite acceptable to me.
Yes, this is more or less how it should work now.
---
Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa @ Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisboa
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#11477) gen imprs, Per I. Mathisen, 2004/12/11
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#11477) gen imprs,
Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#11477) gen imprs, Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa, 2004/12/16
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#11477) gen imprs, Jason Short, 2004/12/16
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#11477) gen imprs, Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa, 2004/12/16
- [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#11477) gen imprs, Jason Short, 2004/12/17
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#11477) gen imprs, Per I. Mathisen, 2004/12/17
- [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#11477) gen imprs, Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa, 2004/12/17
- [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#11477) gen imprs, Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa, 2004/12/17
- [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#11477) gen imprs, Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa, 2004/12/17
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#11477) gen imprs, Marko Lindqvist, 2004/12/18
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#11477) gen imprs, Marko Lindqvist, 2004/12/18
|
|