[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8547) GCC poisoning v2
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=8547 >
Raimar Falke wrote:
> Other question (which I also asked the last time): what are the
> results? Do we have such bad function usage? Why do we have to add the
> test framework into the normal code? Just add the results is fine.
It's convenient to have the "test framework" (#pragma poison) so that
developers get warnings/errors in the course of normal development.
Fixing this after-the-fact takes more work.
jason
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8547) GCC poisoning v2, Raimar Falke, 2004/04/20
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8547) GCC poisoning v2, Per I. Mathisen, 2004/04/20
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8547) GCC poisoning v2, Raimar Falke, 2004/04/20
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8547) GCC poisoning v2,
Jason Short <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8547) GCC poisoning v2, Per I. Mathisen, 2004/04/20
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8547) GCC poisoning v2, Raimar Falke, 2004/04/20
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8547) GCC poisoning v2, Jason Short, 2004/04/20
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8547) GCC poisoning v2, Raimar Falke, 2004/04/20
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8547) GCC poisoning v2, Raimar Falke, 2004/04/21
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8547) GCC poisoning v2, Raimar Falke, 2004/04/21
|
|