Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: April 2004:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8547) GCC poisoning v2
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8547) GCC poisoning v2

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: per@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8547) GCC poisoning v2
From: "Jason Short" <jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:09:02 -0700
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=8547 >

Raimar Falke wrote:

> Other question (which I also asked the last time): what are the
> results? Do we have such bad function usage? Why do we have to add the
> test framework into the normal code? Just add the results is fine.

It's convenient to have the "test framework" (#pragma poison) so that 
developers get warnings/errors in the course of normal development. 
Fixing this after-the-fact takes more work.

jason




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]