Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: April 2004:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8470) Bombardment ruleset
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8470) Bombardment ruleset

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: use_less@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8470) Bombardment ruleset
From: "ue80@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ue80@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 02:17:02 -0700
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=8470 >

On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 12:50:17AM -0700, James Canete wrote:
> 
> <URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=8470 >
> 
> Here's a preliminary ruleset for bombardment.
> 
> It's basically default ruleset with the following units given
> "Bombarder" unit flags and bombard_rate values:
> 
> Catapult, Cannon, Artillery, Howitzer, Bomber, Stealth Bomber, Trireme,
> Caravel, Frigate, Ironclad, Destroyer, Cruiser, AEGIS Cruiser,
> Battleship, Carrier.

I think Catapult, Cannon, Trireme, Caravel, Frigate shouldn't get the
Bombarder flag, because the range of their attack isn't big enough to
attack without the posibility of a counterattack. 

A Carrier shouldn't get it, because usually a carrier doesn't have
strong attacking weapons on it.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Strub  ***  eMail ue80@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
jb: people are stupid, they don't want to learn.




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]