[Freeciv-Dev] Re: the usual clash of personal style
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 12:01:13AM -0800, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
> From: John Goerzen [mailto:jgoerzen@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >
> > Really, you have forced few issues, if any,
> > other than to claim that nobody here is as worthy a Game
> > Designer
>
> Right, nobody here is worthy of the title, insofar as Freeciv
> demonstrates. Would be happy to see your Game Design treatises in other
> work and other forums. Your game design work in Freeciv is moribund.
>
> > as His
> > Royal Highness Brandon Van Every, Owner Of Two Domains.
>
> I could care less about being the basis of comparision. Take
> *anybody's* new ideas. When you have no new ideas whatsoever, you are
> not a Game Designer.
>
> > More to the point, you have demonstrated a serious lack of
> > understanding
> > of how Free Software projects can and do run,
>
> And what point is this? Has software engineering now become the topic
> du jour?
>
> > and your inability to
> > learn from atempts people have made to educate you --
>
> Such as yourself? If I consider a number of things you have said to be
> wrong, and I feel I've addressed your points in debate, and you don't
> choose to accept those points or to acknowledge that I've processed
> yours... this makes me insufficiently or incorrectly educated? I don't
> think so. I think it means you and I don't have much more to say to
> each other.
>
> > and your complete ignorance of a majority of them --
>
> Does "them" have an antecedant? Or are you just on a roll?
>
> > Then, you use that ignorance as the basis for your attacks on the
> > project and its programmers, which by the way, you don't appear to be
> > able to identify.
>
> You want me to name the Freeciv project leads? This is at stake for
> you? Proves / disproves something for you?
>
> > I think that very few people give much consideration to ideas that are
> > given in the form "I am an awesome Game Developer, own two
> > Domain Names,
> > and know many people at the GDC. You are a sucky technology peon and
> > your game sucks and everything about your project is crap. You should
> > really submit to my will in every way, and implement the
> > following ideas to the letter."
>
> My comments are more specific than that. It's clear though that you've
> lost emotional control and aren't going to argue straight.
>
> > You have not shown anybody even one line of code, and you use as an
> > excuse that you were rebuffed. BS! FreeCiv is GPL, and nobody can
> > rebuff you from writing good code for it.
>
> I've had private e-mail discussions about the culture clash here. I'm a
> businessman: I evaluate things in terms of time, money, risk, schedules,
> and deadlines. That means nothing gets written until the plan is
> viable. You, it seems, are a typical open source hobbyist. You think
> it's all about handing over completed chunks of code to others. This is
> how you transmit respect and goodwill in your communities. That sort of
> thing is against my intersts. It costs me money, and it stands a very h
> igh chance of being for nothing.
>
> > > Here's my return advice: get
> > > what you want out of things. And ignore / bypass people who can't /
> > > won't help you do that.
> >
> > Excellent. Does that mean we should all killfile you then?
>
> Please feel free.
>
> However, I think part of you realizes the truth behind a number of
> things I say, and you just don't like hearing it. You know the game
> designing isn't any good around here. You know I haven't actually
> insulted anyone's network code, or project organization. There's a very
> simple way to understand where I'm coming from:
>
> - I can't stand people who clone commercial games and never contribute
> any game design thought of their own.
" "
Thomas
--
Thomas Strub *** eMail ue80@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reden ist Silber,
Schweigen ist Gold!
|
|