Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: November 2003:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6944) repodlg.c: showing only 11-step-reachable t
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6944) repodlg.c: showing only 11-step-reachable t

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: az@xxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6944) repodlg.c: showing only 11-step-reachable techs
From: "Raimar Falke" <i-freeciv-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 01:35:19 -0800
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=6944 >

On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 07:38:47AM -0800, Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa wrote:
> 
> <URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=6944 >
> 
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Raimar Falke wrote:
> 
> >
> > <URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=6944 >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 05:44:29AM -0800, Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa 
> > wrote:
> > > I'm not sure we should bother, I mean, it "works" as it is and GTK+ 2.0
> > > is the default client now, not to mention it supports more platforms
> > > properly than GTK+ 1.2...
> >
> > Have I mentioned that gtk2 is still slower by a large factor compared
> > to gtk1.
> 
> And GTK+ 1.2 is slower than Xaw. The question is: is it unbearable?
> I am willing to improve the GTK+ 2.0 performance, but for that I need
> concrete data on the cause(s) of slowdowns.

See new post for PR#6792.

        Raimar

-- 
 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Windows: Where do you want to go today?
 Linux: Where do you want to go tomorrow?
 BSD: Are you guys coming or what?




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]