[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6944) repodlg.c: showing only 11-step-reachable t
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: |
az@xxxxxx |
Subject: |
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6944) repodlg.c: showing only 11-step-reachable techs |
From: |
"Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa" <vasc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 06:26:20 -0800 |
Reply-to: |
rt@xxxxxxxxxxx |
<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=6944 >
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Raimar Falke wrote:
>
> <URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=6944 >
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 07:38:47AM -0800, Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa
> wrote:
> >
> > <URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=6944 >
> >
> > On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Raimar Falke wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > <URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=6944 >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 05:44:29AM -0800, Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa
> > > wrote:
> > > > I'm not sure we should bother, I mean, it "works" as it is and GTK+ 2.0
> > > > is the default client now, not to mention it supports more platforms
> > > > properly than GTK+ 1.2...
> > >
> > > Have I mentioned that gtk2 is still slower by a large factor compared
> > > to gtk1.
> >
> > And GTK+ 1.2 is slower than Xaw. The question is: is it unbearable?
> > I am willing to improve the GTK+ 2.0 performance, but for that I need
> > concrete data on the cause(s) of slowdowns.
>
> See new post for PR#6792.
Good news then, at least things are shaping up a bit. I will try to see if
I can further improve performance on the areas affected by the patch.
---
Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa @ Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisboa
|
|