[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6669) Poles on a N-S wrapping topology
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=6669 >
After some thinking I now fully agree with Ross' position. The option
"haspoles" is completely unnecessary.
The behaviour should be:
* separatepoles = 1, N-S wrap off: two separate arctic continents
* separatepoles = 1, N-S wrap on : one separate arctic continent
* separatepoles = 0, any wrap: no specially crafted separate arctic
continents, but the normal continents will have colder terrain in extreme
north and south coordinates (as in the other cases).
Best wishes,
G.
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6669) Poles on a N-S wrapping topology, Jason Short, 2003/11/09
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6669) Poles on a N-S wrapping topology, rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2003/11/09
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6669) Poles on a N-S wrapping topology,
Gregory Berkolaiko <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6669) Poles on a N-S wrapping topology, Jason Short, 2003/11/10
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6669) Poles on a N-S wrapping topology, ue80@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2003/11/10
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6669) Poles on a N-S wrapping topology, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2003/11/10
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6669) Poles on a N-S wrapping topology, rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2003/11/27
|
|