Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: July 2003:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4345) pcity->occupied not properly updated 		Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4345) pcity->occupied not properly updated

[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Gregory.Berkolaiko@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4345) pcity->occupied not properly updated
From: "Jason Short" <jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 10:08:06 -0700
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Jason Short wrote:
> 
> 
>>Here are updates of both variants, which I have called A and B.  Again, 
>>A is simple but leads to spurious packets being sent every time units 
>>move into/out of a city.  B is slightly more complicated and only sends 
>>update packets when needed.
> 
> 
> B is for Better.
> 
> Why having a traderoute to a city qualifies you to have the updated 
> "occupied" info on the city?

Basically by chance.  If you have a traderoute to a city you get 
short_city_packets updating you about that city.  This information just 
happens to include the occupied status.

jason
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]