[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4345) pcity->occupied not properly updated
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Jason Short wrote:
> Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Jason Short wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Here are updates of both variants, which I have called A and B. Again,
> >>A is simple but leads to spurious packets being sent every time units
> >>move into/out of a city. B is slightly more complicated and only sends
> >>update packets when needed.
> >
> >
> > B is for Better.
> >
> > Why having a traderoute to a city qualifies you to have the updated
> > "occupied" info on the city?
>
> Basically by chance. If you have a traderoute to a city you get
> short_city_packets updating you about that city. This information just
> happens to include the occupied status.
Ok, then why having a traderoute to a city qualifies you to receive any
info contained in the dumb_city struct? It doesn't contain anything
about trade, does it?
G.
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4345) pcity->occupied not properly updated,
Gregory Berkolaiko <=
|
|