Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: August 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: New ruleset (Synched) (PR#1804)

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: New ruleset (Synched) (PR#1804)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: "Per I. Mathisen" <per@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: New ruleset (Synched) (PR#1804)
From: Reinier Post <rp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 13:08:20 +0200

On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 01:07:55PM -0700, Per I. Mathisen wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Reinier Post wrote:
> > Freeciv CVS used to be the place where stable developments would go
> > after everybody agreed on them.And many developments that qualify
> > don't even make it in.Bobby Bryant's modpack, for example, which
> > has existed for years, never made it in.
> AFAIK also not updated in quite a while.
> > The "history" tech tree doesn't even exist yet!
> ...
> > No, and it's not a big deal, but it makes me wonder about your policy
> > concerning CVS.
> You are wrong here, Reinier. This was discussed extensively on
> freeciv-data a few months back. Also the question on adding more rulesets
> to cvs was discussed and there was IMHO a clear consensus in favour of it.

I don't recall any discussion on freeciv-data regarding the point at which
something should be committed to CVS.

> Yours
> Per

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]