Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: August 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: New ruleset (Synched) (PR#1804)

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: New ruleset (Synched) (PR#1804)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: New ruleset (Synched) (PR#1804)
From: Raimar Falke <rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:34:10 +0200

On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 09:43:04PM +0200, Reinier Post wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 12:05:53PM +0200, Raimar Falke wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 11:01:13AM +0200, Reinier Post wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 10:23:44PM +0200, Raimar Falke wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I have added the "history" ruleset. I would like to apply your patch
> > > > on this. Can you mail me a summary of the changes you have made?
> > > > 
> > > >         Raimar
> > > 
> > > I don't think this should go into CVS yet.
> > 
> > Why not? I have no problem to add this patch and another one in a
> > week. IMHO this is required to get something starting.
> Freeciv CVS used to be the place where stable developments would go
> after everybody agreed on them.  And many developments that qualify
> don't even make it in.  Bobby Bryant's modpack, for example, which
> has existed for years, never made it in.  The "history" tech tree
> doesn't even exist yet!

But there was enough discussion that showed interest. It is also more
"natural" to have a educational more single-player ruleset and a
balanced more multi-player ruleset than an Ancient modpack.

> > However if you have problems because the patch is wrong in some parts
> > please state so.
> No, and it's not a big deal, but it makes me wonder about your policy
> concerning CVS.

Since it isn't that critical I would open it wide. And I also can
judge the content very much. I don't have a degree in history.


 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  A supercomputer is a computer running an endless loop in just a second

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]